Welfare reform must not punish those who need help the most
- claudiamalallah
- Jun 25
- 2 min read
In recent weeks, many constituents across North East Fife have written to me to share their concerns about the UK Government’s proposed reforms to Universal Credit and wider welfare policy, including Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Although PIP has now been largely replaced in Scotland by the new Adult Disability Payment (ADP), there’s no doubt that any expected changes will have an impact via future Scottish budget allocations. The Scottish Government has made a number of devolved welfare decisions, and a greater part of the Scottish budget is currently taken up in Social Security payments in comparison to other parts of the UK. However, we shouldn’t forget that people with chronic illnesses, disabilities, and mental health conditions who are likely to be affected are understandably concerned about what lies ahead.
The Government’s new Welfare Reform Bill propose changes to the way support is assessed and allocated, and the changes are also likely to affect a number of unpaid carers, potentially up to 150 000, who will lose their allowance due to changes in the assessment of those they care for.
Here in North East Fife, we know that accessing the right support can already be difficult. I regularly hear from constituents facing long waits, confusing bureaucracy, and overly harsh assessments from both the DWP and Social Security Scotland. Reform is needed, but it must be compassionate and evidence-led. We all want to see growth in our economy and those that can work supported to find it.
The Liberal Democrats will stand firmly against any measures that erode the rights and support available to people who genuinely need help. We have tabled a reasoned amendment to this bill to remove its most harmful elements and push for reforms that focus on getting support right, not making harsh cuts. If selected for voting, and if successful, this will prevent the bill from progressing to its later stages.
There’s also mounting opposition within the Labour Party itself, with a number of Labour MPs tabling their own amendments, and we wait to see which amendment will be selected on the day. The Government could be left relying on support from the Conservative Party to pass its legislation, which would be extremely damaging to the Prime Minister’s authority.
I will continue to speak up for constituents affected by these proposals, as well as recognising the importance of using Government funding appropriately. I urge the UK Government to think again.